Video-atlas of thoracoscopic formal lung resections emulating traditional open techniques - Editor’s comments
Masters of Cardiothoracic Surgery

Video-atlas of thoracoscopic formal lung resections emulating traditional open techniques - Editor’s comments

Kumud Dhital

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St Vincent’s Hospital, Darlinghurst, Sydney, Australia

Corresponding to: Email:

DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2012.04.07

The following video compilation by Dr Demmy is a valuable atlas of thoracoscopic lobectomy, both for thoracic trainees, for whom this approach will become increasingly routine, and for senior surgeons wishing to expand and evolve their surgical repertoire for lung cancer surgery. The videos, with excellent clarity and appropriate narrative, sequentially take the viewer through five individual lobectomies, which are accompanied by a helpful side bar that demonstrates the correct placement of the thoracoscope and other instruments at every stage. Surgeons who are currently using a standard thoracotomy will recognise the exposures and patient positioning. Those used to performing some VATS procedures will be familiar with the triangulation technique used in these videos with 2 ports and an additional access incision.

Two decades after its first description, lung resection by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has not only answered the initial criticisms questioning its alignment with the principles of surgical oncology (1), but has survived through to reach for the higher ground with a growing evidence base for its superiority over its more invasive counterpart of a larger and rib spreading conventional thoracotomy in the management of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Advantages of less pain, less blood loss, less frequent post-operative complications, shorter hospital stay, earlier post-operative recovery, better post-operative lung function and an earlier facilitation for the timely delivery of adjuvant therapy when necessary, are increasingly reported in the literature (2-5). The thoroughness of mediastinal lymph nodes sampling is not compromised by thoracoscopy. More importantly, the medium and long-term survival following VATS lobectomy is not only comparable (6-9), but may even be superior to that following open thoracotomy (10).

These comparisons have been made with the standard postero-lateral thoracotomy, which entails significant muscle division and rib-spreading. Some surgeons are limiting this by moving towards a more anterior incision, while others are embracing a hybrid approach through a limited thoracotomy with thoracoscopic assistance. Evidence that VATS lobectomy causes less inhibition of underlying immune function when compared to lung resection via a thoracotomy (11), would further support a survival advantage with the less invasive approach and adds impetus to embracing this technology on a larger scale than is prevalent amongst thoracic surgeons. This has largely resulted from a shortage of experienced surgical mentors and less from any continued scepticism of VATS lobectomy as a legitimate surgical technique that respects oncological principles. Dr Demmy’s video atlas is a welcome addition to the limited resources in this field and should serve to stimulate a greater uptake of thorasoscopic lung resections.


  1. Swanson SJ, Herndon JE 2nd, D’Amico TA, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: report of CALGB 39802--a prospective, multi-institution feasibility study. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:4993-7.
  2. Demmy TL, Curtis JJ. Minimally invasive lobectomy directed toward frail and high-risk patients: a case-control study. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:194-200.
  3. Giudicelli R, Thomas P, Lonjon T, et al. Major pulmonary resection by video assisted mini-thoracotomy. Initial experience in 35 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1994;8:254-8.
  4. Walker WS. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy: the Edinburgh experience. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;10:291-9.
  5. Nakata M, Saeki H, Yokoyama N, et al. Pulmonary function after lobectomy: video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:938-41.
  6. Walker WS, Codispoti M, Soon SY, et al. Long-term outcomes following VATS lobectomy for non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;23:397-402.
  7. McKenna RJ Jr, Wolf RK, Brenner M, et al. Is lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery an adequate cancer operation? Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:1903-8.
  8. McKenna RJ Jr, Houck W, Fuller CB. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: experience with 1,100 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:421-5; discussion 425-6.
  9. Yan TD, Black D, Bannon PG, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials on safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:2553-62.
  10. Kaseda S, Aoki T, Hangai N, et al. Better pulmonary function and prognosis with video-assisted thoracic surgery than with thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70:1644-46.
  11. Whitson BA, D’Cunha J, Andrade RS, et al. Thoracoscopic versus thoracotomy approaches to lobectomy: differential impairment of cellular immunity. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:1735-44.
Cite this article as: Dhital K. Video-atlas of thoracoscopic formal lung resections emulating traditional open techniques - Editor’s comments. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2012;1(1):86-87. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2012.04.07

Article Options

Download Citation