@article{ACS16770,
author = {Nicholas A. Oh and Polydoros N. Kampaktsis and Michele Gallo and Alvise Guariento and Viktoria Weixler and Steven J. Staffa and Dimitrios V. Avgerinos and Andrea Colli and Ilias P. Doulamis},
title = {An updated meta-analysis of MitraClip versus surgery for mitral regurgitation},
journal = {Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery},
volume = {10},
number = {1},
year = {2020},
keywords = {},
abstract = {Background: Although studies demonstrate its feasibility, there is ongoing debate on the short and long-term outcomes of MitraClip versus surgical repair or mitral valve replacement (MVR). The objective of this meta-analysis is to compare the safety, morbidity, mortality and long-term function following MitraClip compared to MVR.
Methods: Articles were searched in Pubmed and Cochrane databases for studies comparing outcomes of MitraClip and surgery on December 1, 2019. Eligible prospective, retrospective, randomized and non-randomized studies were reviewed.
Results: A total of nine studies (n=1,873, MitraClip =533, MVR =644) were eligible for review. At baseline, MitraClip patients had more comorbidities than MVR patients, including myocardial infarction (P},
issn = {2304-1021}, url = {https://www.annalscts.com/article/view/16770}
}