@article{ACS7861,
author = {Sohaib A. Virk and Arunan Sriravindrarajah and Douglas Dunn and Kevin Liou and Hugh Wolfenden and Genevieve Tan and Christopher Cao},
title = {A meta-analysis of mitral valve repair versus replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation},
journal = {Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery},
volume = {4},
number = {5},
year = {2015},
keywords = {},
abstract = {Background: The development of ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) portends a poor prognosis and is associated with adverse long-term outcomes. Although both mitral valve repair (MVr) and mitral valve replacement (MVR) have been performed in the surgical management of IMR, there remains uncertainty regarding the optimal approach. The aim of the present study was to meta-analyze these two procedures, with mortality as the primary endpoint.
Methods: Seven databases were systematically searched for studies reporting peri-operative or late mortality following MVr and MVR for IMR. Data were independently extracted by two reviewers and meta-analyzed according to pre-defined study selection criteria and clinical endpoints.
Results: Overall, 22 observational studies (n=3,815 patients) and one randomized controlled trial (n=251) were included. Meta-analysis demonstrated significantly reduced peri-operative mortality [relative risk (RR) 0.61; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.47-0.77; I2=0%; P},
issn = {2304-1021}, url = {https://www.annalscts.com/article/view/7861}
}