Important recent insights into the genetics and biology of malignant pleural mesothelioma
Research Highlight

Important recent insights into the genetics and biology of malignant pleural mesothelioma

Robert McMillan1,2, Marjorie Zauderer3, Matthew Bott1,2, Marc Ladanyi1

1Department of Pathology and Human Oncology & Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; 2Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; 3Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA

Corresponding to:
Marc Ladanyi, M.D. Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.

Submitted Sep 23, 2012. Accepted for publication Oct 26, 2012.
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2012.10.09

Knowledge of the disease-specific genetic mutations in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has the potential to lead to rational targeted therapies. Recent studies have reported previously unknown recurrent genetic alterations in the BAP1 and LATS2 genes. Additional work has increased our understanding of the mechanism by which inactivating mutations in NF2 cause tumorigenesis. This review will highlight these recent discoveries and their relevance to MPM therapeutics.


BRCA-associated protein 1 (BAP1) is a 729 amino acid protein encoded by the BAP1 gene at chromosome 3p21. A recent integrated genomics analysis identified somatic mutations and genomic losses of BAP1 in approximately 25% of MPM (1). Subsequent groups have identified germline mutations of BAP1 in families with a high incidence of MPM, uveal melanoma (UM), melanocytic tumors, cutaneous melanoma (CM), and other cancers (2,3). Somatic mutations of BAP1 occur in approximately 84% of metastasizing UM, 14% of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and a small subset of lung and breast cancer (4-7).

Functional studies of BAP1 have characterized the protein as a nuclear-localized deubiquitinase (DUB) and member of the ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase (UCH) family of DUBs. Mass spectrometry studies have identified host cell factor 1 (HCF1) and additional sex combs like protein 1 (ASXL1) as the major BAP1 binding partners. Together with HCF1, BAP1 modulates the expression of genes whose promoter regions are bound by the transcription factors E2F and YY1, or other as yet undefined transcription factors. HCF1 recruits histone methyltransferases to confer activating histone marks on the chromatin at promoter regions, thereby increasing gene transcription (8-10). As a binding partner with ASXL1, BAP1 forms the Polycomb repressive deubiquitinase (PR-DUB) complex, which cleaves ubiquitin from histone H2A. Histone H2A monoubiquitinated at lysine 119 is a regulatory mark in the Polycomb protein complex-mediated system of gene regulation (11). Polycomb proteins guide differentiation during embryogenesis, and defects in various subunits of the Polycomb protein complex have been found in a variety of cancers (12). Knockdown of BAP1 using siRNA has been shown to alter the expression of E2F and YY1-regulated genes and Polycomb-associated genes (1,10). Other possible functions of BAP1 include a role in DNA damage repair, but this remains to be better defined (5). Although the BAP1 protein was originally discovered using a yeast two-hybrid screen with the RING finger domain of BRCA1 as bait, the association between BAP1 and BRCA1 remains unclear.

Based on BAP1’s apparent role in histone ubiquitination and the known functional inter-relationships between different histone modifications, agents targeting another type of chromatin modification, histone acteylation, have been tested in UM and MPM cell lines. The histone deacetylase inhibitors Vorinostat (a.k.a. SAHA), trichostatin A, and valproic acid (VPA) all caused growth arrest in BAP1 wild type (WT) UM cell lines and reverted the gene expression profile to a well-characterized less aggressive state. BAP1 shRNA knockdown in UM cell lines increased sensitivity to VPA and reduced cell proliferation, but similar work using SAHA in the MPM cell lines 211H, HMeso, and H2373 [all BAP1 wild-type] as well as H28 (BAP1 deficient) failed to show a simple relationship between BAP1 loss and increased sensitivity to histone deacetylase inhibitors (13). (R. McMillan, M. Ladanyi, unpublished data) Furthermore, the large Phase III VANTAGE trial of SAHA as a second-line chemotherapy failed to show a survival benefit or clinically significant increase in progression free survival (PFS) (14). Interestingly, studies in RCC cell lines have shown increased sensitivity to a PARP inhibitor in cells when BAP1 levels were reduced by treatment with BAP1 shRNA (5).

The BAP1 mutation is a sensitive and specific marker for metastatic potential in UM and correlates with higher tumor grade in RCC (4,5). BAP1 loss has yet to be linked to a more aggressive phenotype in MPM, though it may be associated with higher rates of tobacco use (M. Zauderer, unpublished data). A recent study of patients with BAP1 germline mutations underscores the importance of dermatologic and ophthalmologic surveillance examinations in these individuals for secondary prevention of CM and UM (15).


Inactivating mutations in the neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) gene have been reported in 35-40% of MPM. NF2 encodes an ERM (ezrin, radixin, and moesin) domain protein also known as Merlin, which acts as a tumor suppressor mediating contact inhibition of proliferation (16,17). NF2 resides on chromosome 22q11, and was originally identified as the causative mutation of familial neurofibromatosis. Additional studies have identified NF2 mutations in sporadic schwannomas, ependymomas, meningiomas, MPM, and a smaller number of RCC and CM (18).

ERM proteins link membrane proteins to the cortical actin cytoskeleton, and for this reason NF2 had been postulated to function primarily at the cell cortex, the cytoplasmic region on the inner face of the cell membrane (19). Functional studies have established that NF2 regulates Rac-PAK signaling, the EGFR-RAS-ERK pathway, the PI3K-Akt pathway, and FAK-Src signaling (20,21). However, unlike other ERM proteins, NF2 lacks a canonical, carboxy-terminal actin-binding motif and the active form of NF2 localizes to the nucleus (22). NF2 is active in its “closed” conformation, which is formed by intramolecular bonding between its N-terminal FERM domain and its C-terminal tail, rather than in its “open” conformation like other ERM proteins. Phosphorylation of NF2 at S518 disrupts intramolecular binding, resulting in NF2 adopting an “open”, inactive conformation (17).

A recent mass spectrometry study identified the E3 ubiquitin ligase CRL4 as a major binding partner of WT NF2 but not mutated forms of NF2 found in cancer. WT NF2 binds to the DCAF1 subunit of CRL4 where it inhibits CRL4-mediated ubiquitination of histones and other target proteins. Without NF2 inhibition, CRL4 activates a broad oncogenic program leading to cell hyperproliferation, though the substrates of CRL4 have yet to be fully identified (22). The common link between NF2, BAP1, and ubiquitination of histones presents an intriguing possibility of interaction between these two major MPM tumor suppressor genes.

The additional discovery that NF2 loss leads to mTORC1 activation independent of the AKT pathway offers an avenue for targeted inhibition of this pathway (23). Preclinical studies using everolimus as well as a combination of kinase inhibitors and rapamycin show increased sensitivity in cell lines with NF2 loss compared to NF2 wild-type (23,24). The Phase II Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) study of everolimus as a single-agent, second-line chemotherapy failed to meet its primary endpoint of 4 month PFS, but the patients enrolled were unselected for NF2 loss (25).


A comparative genome hybridization study of MPM cell lines recently led to the discovery of recurrent mutations in the Large tumor suppressor 2 (LATS2) gene at chromosome 13q12. The incidence of LATS2 mutations in tumor samples was lower than that found in cell lines—7 mutations in 20 cell lines versus 3 mutations in 25 tumor samples—though additional groups have reported LATS2 mutations in MPM tumors (1,26). The LATS2 protein is a serine threonine kinase that phosphorylates Yes-associated protein (YAP) and is a member of the Hippo signaling pathway. The Hippo pathway controls organ-growth during embryogenesis, and alterations of the pathway have been implicated in tumorigenesis by impairing contact inhibition of cell growth. YAP is the main downstream mediator of the Hippo pathway, functioning as a transcription factor which is active and nuclear-localized in its dephosphorylated state. YAP overexpression in the nucleus has been noted previously in MPM as well as hepatocellular carcinoma, lung cancer, and colon cancer. Phosphorylation of YAP by LATS2 inactivates the transcription factor and sequesters YAP in the cytoplasm (27,28). Interestingly, NF2 loss has also been associated with increased nuclear expression of YAP. Also, NF2 cDNA transfection in NF2-deficient MPM cell lines results in increased YAP phosphorylation (29). However the MPM cell line Y-Meso-14 harbors both NF2 and LATS2 inactivating mutations, and transfection with plasmid encoding LATS2 but not NF2 is sufficient to restore YAP phosphorylation, suggesting NF2 acts upstream of LATS2 (26).


Disease-specific mutations in cancer offer the potential for rational targeted therapeutics. Previous discoveries in MPM genetics such as the frequent homozygous deletion of P16/CDKN2A at 9p21 have been correlated with patient outcome (30). New findings such as BAP1 germline mutations may identify groups at greater risk for MPM who might benefit from increased surveillance and early intervention. The identification of pathways altered in MPM such as the PI3K-AKT-mTORC1 and the Hippo pathway may lead to targeted therapies that could be more effective than current therapies. A Phase I trial of the PI3K-AKT-mTORC1 inhibitor GDC-0980 has shown activity in patients with MPM and may represent an example of this sort of therapy (31). Further advances in our understanding of the molecular biology of MPM are likely to emerge in the near future as more cases will be subjected to next-generation sequencing of whole exomes, whole transcriptomes, and whole genomes.


Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Bott M, Brevet M, Taylor BS, et al. The nuclear deubiquitinase BAP1 is commonly inactivated by somatic mutations and 3p21.1 losses in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Nat Genet 2011;43:668-72.
  2. Testa JR, Cheung M, Pei J, et al. Germline BAP1 mutations predispose to malignant mesothelioma. Nat Genet 2011;43:1022-5.
  3. Wiesner T, Obenauf AC, Murali R, et al. Germline mutations in BAP1 predispose to melanocytic tumors. Nat Genet 2011;43:1018-21.
  4. Harbour JW, Onken MD, Roberson ED, et al. Frequent mutation of BAP1 in metastasizing uveal melanomas. Science 2010;330:1410-3.
  5. Peña-Llopis S, Vega-Rubín-de-Celis S, Liao A, et al. BAP1 loss defines a new class of renal cell carcinoma. Nat Genet 2012;44:751-9.
  6. Guo G, Gui Y, Gao S, et al. Frequent mutations of genes encoding ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis pathway components in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Nat Genet 2011;44:17-9.
  7. Jensen DE, Proctor M, Marquis ST, et al. BAP1: a novel ubiquitin hydrolase which binds to the BRCA1 RING finger and enhances BRCA1-mediated cell growth suppression. Oncogene 1998;16:1097-112.
  8. Machida YJ, Machida Y, Vashisht AA, et al. The deubiquitinating enzyme BAP1 regulates cell growth via interaction with HCF-1. J Biol Chem 2009;284:34179-88.
  9. Misaghi S, Ottosen S, Izrael-Tomasevic A, et al. Association of C-terminal ubiquitin hydrolase BRCA1-associated protein 1 with cell cycle regulator host cell factor 1. Mol Cell Biol 2009;29:2181-92.
  10. Yu H, Mashtalir N, Daou S, et al. The ubiquitin carboxyl hydrolase BAP1 forms a ternary complex with YY1 and HCF-1 and is a critical regulator of gene expression. Mol Cell Biol 2010;30:5071-85.
  11. Scheuermann JC, de Ayala Alonso AG, Oktaba K, et al. Histone H2A deubiquitinase activity of the Polycomb repressive complex PR-DUB. Nature 2010;465:243-7.
  12. Bracken AP, Helin K. Polycomb group proteins: navigators of lineage pathways led astray in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2009;9:773-84.
  13. Landreville S, Agapova OA, Matatall KA, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors induce growth arrest and differentiation in uveal melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 2012;18:408-16.
  14. Krug LM, Kindler H, Calvert H, et al. VANTAGE 014: Vorinostat in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma who have failed prior pemetrexed and either cisplatin or carboplatin therapy: a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur J Cancer 2011;47:2-3.
  15. Carbone M, Korb Ferris L, Baumann F, et al. BAP1 cancer syndrome: malignant mesothelioma, uveal and cutaneous melanoma, and MBAITs. J Transl Med 2012;10:179.
  16. Bianchi AB, Mitsunaga SI, Cheng JQ, et al. High frequency of inactivating mutations in the neurofibromatosis type 2 gene (NF2) in primary malignant mesotheliomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995;92:10854-8.
  17. Sekido Y, Pass HI, Bader S, et al. Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) gene is somatically mutated in mesothelioma but not in lung cancer. Cancer Res 1995;55:1227-31.
  18. Li W, Cooper J, Karajannis MA, et al. Merlin: a tumour suppressor with functions at the cell cortex and in the nucleus. EMBO Rep 2012;13:204-15.
  19. McClatchey AI, Fehon RG. Merlin and the ERM proteins--regulators of receptor distribution and signaling at the cell cortex. Trends Cell Biol 2009;19:198-206.
  20. Okada T, Lopez-Lago M, Giancotti FG. Merlin/NF-2 mediates contact inhibition of growth by suppressing recruitment of Rac to the plasma membrane. J Cell Biol 2005;171:361-71.
  21. Varghese S, Chen Z, Bartlett DL, et al. Activation of the phosphoinositide-3-kinase and mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathways are associated with shortened survival in patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. Cancer 2011;117:361-71.
  22. Li W, You L, Cooper J, et al. Merlin/NF2 suppresses tumorigenesis by inhibiting the E3 ubiquitin ligase CRL4(DCAF1) in the nucleus. Cell 2010;140:477-90.
  23. López-Lago MA, Okada T, Murillo MM, et al. Loss of the tumor suppressor gene NF2, encoding merlin, constitutively activates integrin-dependent mTORC1 signaling. Mol Cell Biol 2009;29:4235-49.
  24. Brevet M, Shimizu S, Bott MJ, et al. Coactivation of receptor tyrosine kinases in malignant mesothelioma as a rationale for combination targeted therapy. J Thorac Oncol 2011;6:864-74.
  25. Garland LL, Ou SH, Moon J, et al. SWOG 0722: A phase II study of mTOR inhibitor everolimus (RAD001) in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). J Clin Oncol 2012 30:abstr 7083.
  26. Murakami H, Mizuno T, Taniguchi T, et al. LATS2 is a tumor suppressor gene of malignant mesothelioma. Cancer Res 2011;71:873-83.
  27. Mizuno T, Murakami H, Fujii M, et al. YAP induces malignant mesothelioma cell proliferation by upregulating transcription of cell cycle-promoting genes. Oncogene 2012. [Epub ahead of print].
  28. Sekido Y. Inactivation of Merlin in malignant mesothelioma cells and the Hippo signaling cascade dysregulation. Pathol Int 2011;61:331-44.
  29. Yokoyama T, Osada H, Murakami H, et al. YAP1 is involved in mesothelioma development and negatively regulated by Merlin through phosphorylation. Carcinogenesis 2008;29:2139-46.
  30. López-Ríos F, Chuai S, Flores R, et al. Global gene expression profiling of pleural mesotheliomas: overexpression of aurora kinases and P16/CDKN2A deletion as prognostic factors and critical evaluation of microarray-based prognostic prediction. Cancer Res 2006;66:2970-9.
  31. Wagner AJ, Bendell JC, Dolly S, et al. A first-in-human phase I study to evaluate GDC-0980, an oral PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, administered QD in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:abstr 3020.
Cite this article as: McMillan R, Zauderer M, Bott M, Ladanyi M. Important recent insights into the genetics and biology of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2012;1(4):462-465. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2012.10.09

Article Options

Download Citation